Should it be every man for himself when the SHTF?
When a major crisis strikes and the proverbial “SHTF” (S**t Hits The Fan), it can be a chaotic and unpredictable time. People are often left to fend for themselves and their families, searching for resources and trying to survive. This begs the question: should it be every man for himself in such a situation?
While the idea of looking out for oneself may seem instinctual, it is important to consider the potential consequences of adopting a solely self-centered mentality during a crisis. In this article, we will explore the pros and cons of the “every man for himself” approach and offer alternative strategies that may lead to a more sustainable and secure outcome.
The Pros of “Every Man for Himself”
1. Self-Preservation: When resources are scarce and danger is imminent, prioritizing one’s own survival can seem like a logical choice. By focusing solely on your own needs, you may increase your chances of staying alive and protecting your loved ones.
2. Independence: Relying on oneself can be empowering and liberating. In a crisis, being self-sufficient can ensure that you are not reliant on others who may or may not have your best interests at heart.
3. Speed and Agility: Decisions can be made quickly and actions can be taken without the need for consensus or compromise. This can be advantageous when time is of the essence and quick thinking is required.
The Cons of “Every Man for Himself”
1. Lack of Unity: Adopting a solely individualistic mindset undermines the potential benefits of a collective effort. By working together, communities can pool resources, share knowledge, and provide support to one another.
2. Increased Vulnerability: Going it alone can leave you more vulnerable to threats. Without the collective security of a group, you may become an easier target for criminals or predators.
3. Moral and Ethical Considerations: The “every man for himself” approach can lead to a breakdown in societal norms and values. Compassion and empathy are key traits that define us as humans, and abandoning them during a crisis can have negative long-term consequences.
1. Community Preparedness: Instead of focusing solely on individual preparedness, consider building a strong community network. By working together with your neighbors, you can pool resources, share skills, and provide support to one another during challenging times.
2. Information Sharing: In a crisis situation, reliable information can be a valuable commodity. By sharing knowledge and expertise, you can help others make informed decisions and increase the overall resilience of your community.
3. Skills Exchange: Each person has unique skills and abilities that can be beneficial to others. Consider organizing skill-sharing workshops or training sessions within your community. This can help build a diverse set of skills that can be utilized during a crisis.
4. Establishing a Leadership Structure: In order to effectively coordinate efforts and make collective decisions, it may be beneficial to establish a leadership structure within your community. This ensures that decisions are made with the best interests of the group in mind.
My 2 Cents
In my opinion, while the instinct to prioritize one’s own survival is understandable, adopting a solely individualistic mindset during a crisis is shortsighted. By working together and supporting one another, communities can increase their chances of survival and create a more resilient future.
When the SHTF, it’s essential to remember that we are all connected and that our collective strength is greater than the sum of our individual efforts. By building strong community networks, sharing knowledge, and embracing compassion, we can weather any storm that comes our way. So, let’s ditch the “every man for himself” mentality and embrace a more collaborative approach to survival.
Remember, preparedness is not just about stocking up on supplies, but also about fostering a sense of unity and cooperation within our communities. Together, we can overcome any challenge that comes our way.